What is running through these people’s veins? Is it blood or fury? Every time there seems to be a slap on the wrist, punch in the face with sanctions or war the people of that nation suffer. The leaders do not suffer because they would never remain in their own country while war or famine is going on.
So are the wars really about killing off humanity so there is no next generation, a type of depopulation wrapped in destruction of evil empires? I’m just thinking...how many leaders /presidents possibly engage in bribery, take a bank roll of money just to step aside from protecting their country? Have our societies become so near and dear to the lake of fire that human life is considered disposable?
I don’t think China would stand by if the U.S. attacked Russia nor would North Korea. Speaking of North Korea, have the sanctions hit home with Kim Jung-Un? I don’t think he lost even a pound from depravation. He always has his unique smile just to say all is well here at home. He is not a Lone Ranger and should always think about his family and how everything he does will effect them for good or evil.
Scripture says if you do evil, evil will never depart from your house. I guess some are so deceived they believe evil is a good thing to have around because they exist with demonic entities living inside them. Their souls have been taken into the darkest abyss.
Proverbs 17:13 Whoso rewardeth evil for good, evil shall not depart from his house.
So when someone’s mouth insinuates war which is really killing people, you have to wonder do they have murderous hearts or are they like Joshua, obeying God’s commands?
Haley: World Must Punish Russia or They’ll Chemical Attack New York City Next
Most people may not draw an immediate connection between Salisbury and New York City. US Ambassador Nikki Haley sees a direct route from the one to the other as part of a Russian chemical weapons plot for which no real evidence exists.
Speaking at an “emergency” UN Security Council session, Haley demanded “immediate, concrete measures” against the Russians based on Britain blaming them for poisonings in Salisbury. She claimed they amount to a chemical weapons attack, and UN credibility is at stake if a permanent council member can do that.
“Time and time again, member-states say they oppose the use of chemical weapons under any circumstance,” Haley said. “Now one member stands accused of using chemical weapons on the sovereign soil of another member. The credibility of this council will not survive if we fail to hold Russia accountable.”
Haley then suggested that the next Russian attack would be against New York City, and that any other city in any other UN Security Council member nation was also a potential target for chemical weapons, unless unspecified actions are taken against Russia.
“If we don't take immediate concrete measures to address this now, Salisbury will not be the last place we see chemical weapons used,” Haley told the United Nations Security Council. “They could be used here in New York, or in cities of any country that sits on this Council. This is a defining moment.”
Russia criticized the “hysterical atmosphere” at the meeting, and has repeatedly denied involvement in the poisoning. Britain has not offered proof of their allegations against Russia, but Haley seemed contented to endorse it publicly.
“A hysterical atmosphere is being created by London,” Russian Ambassador Visaly Nebenzia told the Security Council. “We would like to warn that this will not remain without reaction on our part.”